Today, on the Queen’s 96th Birthday and in celebration of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, Ipswich Member of Parliament Tom Hunt is delighted to announce his new ‘Jubilee card for the Queen competition’ for all Primary Schools and Children aged 11 and under. Tom is asking for children across his Ipswich constituency to design their best card to send to the Queen to celebrate 70 years on the throne.
Whilst there is no limit to the design, it must be colourful and cheerful to reflect the spirit of the celebrations. Entries must be A4 size using pen or pencil and sent to Tom’s Parliamentary Office at ‘Tom Hunt MP, Houses of Commons, Westminster, London, SW1A 0AA’. Please don’t forget to put your name, age and address on the design to make sure we know how to contact the winner!
The competition ends on 17th May with Tom and his team judging the winner and all those who deserve a special mention.
Tom Hunt MP commented “I am really excited to announce my new ‘Jubilee card for the Queen’ competition for Children in Ipswich. This year we mark an incredible achievement by our Queen. 70 years of incredible and loyal service deserves a special celebration and I know with all the amazing young artists we have in Ipswich, this is a great way.
I am very much looking forward to judging all the amazing entries we are going to have and choosing which card will be sent to Buckingham Palace on behalf of myself, and all the people of Ipswich. Good luck!”
Today, Home Secretary Rt Hon Priti Patel is in Rwanda finalising a £120 million deal that will see some asylum seekers’ applications, largely single men that the British Authorities see as inadmissible, processed in the African nation. This is in response to large numbers of individuals who ignore the legal routes for immigration in favour of dangerous crossings in small boats onto British shores. This trade has only grown in recent years, with this year looking set to break another record for attempted crossings. Unfortunately, this success only further encourages individuals to try to cross and has resulted in even more deaths of people trying to reach the UK.
The steps announced by the Home Secretary today are a strong indication of the Government’s commitment to tackle the deplorable trade started by criminal gangs and to prevent the tragic loss of life when these small boats sink. The Prime Minister also announced that this new decision is part of the Government’s longer-term plan to take back control of illegal immigration, with the Royal Navy also now commanding the Channel crossings operation. These are encouraging steps welcomed by the 1922 Backbench Home Affairs Committee.
Chairman Tom Hunt MP commented “Both Lee and I are very confident the vast majority of Conservative MPs will welcome what was announced today. With over 600 people risking their lives by crossing the channel on Wednesday, this is much wanted news. Figures from last year showed over 20,000 more individuals crossed compared with 2020, and the Prime Minister pointed out today that 70% of those who come over illegally are young men. Each one of these crossings is supporting a diabolical trade, fuelled by criminal gangs that does not seem to be slowing down. These steps from the Government today are a big step in the right direction and will place a much-needed deterrence on these crossings.
I have long called for offshore processing since my election in 2019. I firmly believe it is the only way to effectively deter these small boat crossings that so very often result in the tragic loss of life. I know that Australia has effective offshore processing, and it is high time that the United Kingdom follows suit. Since leaving the EU we’ve effectively taken control of legal immigration, but we need to do the same with both illegal immigration and our asylum system, and this is a big step towards that.
I also note that some in the Labour party have labelled this as ‘cruel’ and attempted to link this positive action, long in the pipeline, with the Prime Minister’s current position. I would ask what is crueller? Allowing this illegal trade to continue, where drownings are frequent, high-risk collisions with haulage tankers are likely and where individuals firmly believe living in a camp in Calais is the right thing to do or sending a clear message preventing these journeys in the first place?
I would also argue that every illegal immigrant that ends up on our shores from another safe European country in France, limits our capacity to take in genuine refugees, like those from Ukraine, who desperately need safety and our support. Today’s news opens up a clear dividing line between politicians who truly want us to control our borders and those who don’t.
Some individuals are criticising the cost associated with what is being proposed. I would argue that costs associated with today’s decision are unlikely to be never ending, as the deterring effect, preventing others from making the crossing, will save significant costs in the future. In addition to this I would ask what are the costs of currently accommodating illegal immigrants? Many are in hotels and with record numbers expected this year, this will only add to the never ending costs associated.
I welcome this news and will see that the 1922 Backbench Home Affairs Committee supports the implication of this as soon as possible. It is about time that we tackled this long-standing issue of illegal immigration, and I am glad I can show my constituents, who have long called for firm action to be taken, that the Government is listening and acting.”
Whether it’s the renovation of the former merchant house at 4 College Street or the current rail engineering works that are taking place at the weekend, I think we are all prepared to put up with some degree of disruption. I welcome the fact that a building of historic importance to the Town is being renovated and being brought back into use, and that important enhancement works are taking place on the track between Ipswich and London.
However, whilst acknowledging that these improvements need to take place, I’m sure we’re all keen to know that every step has been taken to minimise the level of disruption that is caused to Ipswich residents.
I for one am keen for assurances that no stone has been left unturned when it comes to looking for ways to minimising disruption to the lives of my constituents while necessary improvement works or engineering works are carried out. Sadly, when it comes to both the renovation work at 4 College Street and the weekend rail engineering works, I do not think this has been the case. My view is that more disruption has been caused than necessary.
With regards to the former Merchant House on College Street, I think it’s very disappointing that a building of such historical importance has been allowed to descend into a state of disrepair to begin with.. For decades it’s been allowed to sit gathering dust, with an elegant historic building gradually turning into an eyesore. Sadly, we know that there are many other similar case studies across Town. Though the reasons behind all of this are quite complex and its impossible to lay the blame at one particular authority or political Party, I do think that a Labour led Borough Council lacking in both dynamism and vision has been a contributing factor.
However, we are where we are, and I welcomed the news that the Borough Council have finally decided to get on with things, take ownership of the building, and initiate renovation works to bring the former merchant house back into use. Coupled with the planned works to the Paul’s Silo building, funded by the Government’s Town Deal, and greening up of the Novotel roundabout through the Town Deal funded Oasis project, the works should provide a big boost to this part of Town.
When I heard last autumn that a lane would be closed on College Street so that the renovation works could take place my first thought was ‘couldn’t these works have taken place during one of the lockdowns to avoid major disruption’? The building has been owned by the Borough Council since 2016, after all.
Generally though, I just hoped that the works would be completed sooner rather than later so that disruption to my constituents could be minimised. Initially the Borough Council stated that the works would last approximately 12 weeks ending in February, however approximately 5 months later we are still having to put up with major traffic disruption on top of what we’re used to – not to mention all the extra air pollution caused by slow moving and stationary vehicles.
Not to mention the cost – in a letter I received from Cllr Ellesmere, he told me it was costing a total of £14,500 to keep the lane in College Street shut. I wonder if that sum includes all the extra, unforeseen closure time which was not anticipated at the start of the project. This is in addition to the cost to individuals in terms of longer journeys, and to businesses in the Town as the traffic impacts their trade and accessibility.
I’ve received scant information on these works from the Borough Council, but my current understanding is that it’s anticipated that the works won’t be completed until May. My hope is that by putting pressure on the Borough Council we may be able to accelerate things – but we will see.
I understand that complications have been discovered with the former Merchant House that have meant it’s taking longer than anticipated. Bearing in mind the age of the building and the extent to which it had been allowed to get into disrepair, I think its hardly surprising that there are complications. Perhaps this should have been factored into considerations at the start.
Unsurprisingly, a large number of constituents have contacted me about the level of disruption caused. Nearly all are understanding as to why the works need to take place but as every month has passed frustration has grown at the extent of the disruption that has been caused over such a long period of time. Like me, they’re not convinced that no stone has been left unturned when it comes to minimising the disruption and, like me, also have had to factor extra time into their journey to get across Town.
Many have also pointed out to me that they’re never actually seen any works taking place at 4 College Street, which begs the question of whether it has really been necessary to close the lane of one of the busiest roads in central Ipswich for approximately half a year, unabated.
No doubt the Labour leadership of the Borough Council and some of its cheerleaders will try and present a false choice. Either you support bringing these sorts of historic buildings back into use and you accept all the major disruption without question, or you’re against the concept of bringing buildings such as the former Merchant’s House into use. But as I say, this would be a false choice.
The vast majority of us agree that it’s a good thing that historic buildings such as the former Merchant’s House are brought back into use, and we accept that some renovation works will need to take place and that there could be a degree of disruption. The issue has been the extent of the disruption and a strong sense that a lot of it could have been minimised.
Whether it’s the rail engineering works that are currently taking place or the works at Merchant House, it often seems to be the case that those carrying out the necessary works aren’t sensitive enough to the damage and disruption caused by the works taking place and as a consequence don’t always place enough importance on taking all possible steps to keep the disruption down to an absolute minimum.
It won’t be long until the current works in question are complete – and I look forward to the result of the works – but with the current mindset my concern is that there will be more and more disruption across Town that is more severe than it needs to be, as more and more historic buildings that have been allowed to gather dust for far too long are finally brought back into use.