Developers responsible for unsafe cladding
I welcome Michael Gove’s announcements, detailing that the government will be pursuing the developers responsible for unsafe cladding. It is absolutely right that the bill for remediation works does not fall to the leaseholders. Previously only the buildings over 18 metres were included in the Government’s funding for remediation works – this has now been extended to buildings between 11 and 18 metres, should they require cladding works; there are a group of my constituents falling into this category who will be incredibly relieved. The Secretary of State for Housing told us that he would be making sure developers paid for cladding removal from the mid-sized buildings, ensuring that leaseholders won’t have to foot the bill. I do also have concerns about non-cladding related fire safety issues, such as timber balconies and firebreaks.
I told the Secretary of State for Housing that I do not want to be standing in front of him in 6 months’ time with evidence that leaseholders have been unable to sell their flats due to fire safety issues. Of course, the remediation works need to be carried out, but must be sensitive to the residents it affects. In the chamber today I raised the circumstances faced by residents of St Francis Tower, and I was pleased to hear that the Secretary of State, or a minister from the Department, will be visiting Ipswich to see the conditions
There is no justification for any further restrictions
Me earlier discussing Covid and whether there should be any further restrictions.
This nightmare has gone on for long enough. It’s time to live our lives fully
I wish everyone all the best for 2022. My final column of 2021 is once again about the COVID pandemic I’m afraid. In my view 2022 really must be the year where we permanently turn our backs on the kind of illiberal and draconian restrictions we’ve all had to endure at various points over the past 20 months.
Though I’m pleased the Prime Minister hasn’t taken the same path as many other countries (including Scotland and Wales) in introducing lockdown type restrictions this month, even the threat of further restrictions and the return of the Covid cloud over the past month or so has had major consequences for the mental health of millions of people up and down the country. I would even hazard a guess that for some, they’ve actually found the mental health consequences of the past month as bad as – if not worse than – during the dark days of full-on lockdowns.
Personally, I found the last lockdown bearable due to the emergence of the vaccine. I remember in the dark days of lockdown last year, seeing the images of Margaret Keenan, the 91-year-old Brit who became the first person in the world to receive her Covid vaccine, symbolising hope. Living through the lockdowns was tough but at least we all felt there was a definite light at the end of the tunnel. When the road map out of the lockdown was announced it was cautious, but at least there was one direction of travel, towards freedom and getting our lives back, however slow it may have been.
Yet now, despite a one of the most successful vaccine rollouts in the world, the spectre of lockdowns and restrictions on our lives, livelihoods and liberties returns. For many millions of people, this whole thing is beginning to seem like a never-ending nightmare. Is this what is going to happen whenever there is variant of concern in future?
This nightmare has gone on for long enough. It’s time to live our lives fully.
We need to an approach that involves truly learning to live with COVID without the endless restrictions of even the threat of such restrictions. This will not be the last variant!
There are encouraging signs regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine against Omicron and certainly the links between cases, hospitalisations and deaths seems to be very very different to previous waves.
Some very wise words by Dr Chris Smith, a consultant virologist at Cambridge University:
“So far in the pandemic, the country has been divided on how to deal with spikes in cases: there’s those who favour a light touch approach and those who want restrictions imposed. Perhaps now is the moment we can look beyond these arguments, toward a near future where Covid lives with us and we with it. What most people do agree on is that periodically pummelling our pubs and entertainment venues, paralysing the economy, denting education and destabilising the nation’s mental health to control outbreaks of variants with uncertain characteristics is just not a sustainable long-term proposition.”
Winner of Light Up Ipswich’s Best House 2021
Very pleased to hand out my congratulatory letter to the winner of Light Up Ipswich’s Best House 2021!
Jackie has done an incredible job putting up wonderful Christmas lights, going bigger and better after her 3rd place last year. Not only has she been up the scaffolding herself to deck out the house, but she has done it all for charity too! Lovely to see the enthusiasm and effort that has gone into decorating for Christmas here.
Also visited our brilliant runners-up for best house, with a wonderful Christmas lights display on Elevdon close.
COVID STATEMENT
After much consideration I’ve decided that I feel unable to support the Plan B covid measures announced last week. Tomorrow I will be voting against the measures.
This is as much to do with the logic and the mindset that drove Plan B as it is to do with the measures themselves. I do not think we should adopt a “just in case” approach to Covid restrictions because if we do, I believe, we will end up introducing restrictions again and again whenever there is a new variant with significant mutations. Just when would it all end?
I also fear that the mindset and logic that led to Plan B could lead to more and more draconian restrictions coming about in future and this isn’t something that I’m prepared to accept without an extremely strong justification. After getting towards two years of Covid restrictions I’m really not sure whether either our society, or economy, can handle it.
I do not believe that at this stage the evidence is there in relation to Omicron to justify plan B. The Omicron variant has been circulating at high levels in South African for around a month (a country with a much lower vaccination rate than our own) and the indications are that it’s milder than any other Covid variant we have seen thus far.
It is often the case as viruses develop they become more transmissible but less deadly. The emergence of the Omicron variant appears to be consistent with this.
I do accept that the 30 or so mutations that Omicron has mean if you’re only doubled jabbed the vaccine is less effective. However, it also seems clear that getting the booster jab ensures that you have solid levels of protection against Omicron. I support the Government’s campaign to offer the booster jab to everyone above the age of 18 this month. I’m currently in the process of arranging my own. The vaccine, as has always been the case, is our best defence.
When the Prime Minister announced the roadmap out of Covid restrictions early this year at the time when we were rolling out the first vaccine jabs I felt the timetable was a little cautious. However I was happy to support it as there was a clear light at the end of the tunnel and there was one direction of travel (however slow). I have not been a frequent rebel on Covid measures, but I now believe we’ve come to the stage where enough is enough. We cannot go on this way for any longer.
The work from home guidance is likely to cost the economy billions over the next couple of months and hurt our hospitality sector as it desperately looks to continue its recovery from the pain its already experienced over the past 20 months or so. Young workers are also having their development stifled as the room for mentoring and relationship building is snuffed out.
Covid-19 has taken a sledgehammer to the mental health of many of my constituents and millions of people of all ages up and down the country. The doom and the fear of looming restrictions in themselves is enough to send millions of our fellow country men and women literally into depression.
The inability to plan, travel, see loved ones and experience all of life’s richness are a few of the many reasons why lockdown restrictions should be ruled out in future.
We can make the case for these sorts of restrictions when we don’t have a vaccine and perhaps for a short time only. Not when we have an effective vaccine and when we’ve already been through the nightmare we’ve been through over the past 20 months. Life is for the living and it’s time to live without fear.
Of course, the views of scientist’s are extremely important. I can assure you over the weekend I’ve spent a lot of time reading their views and the data they produce. However, we need to follow a course that is proportionate and takes into account not just COVID as a public health challenge but also the devastating impact of restrictions of livelihoods and mental health. Also let us not forget how often many of these scientists’ projections have proved so wrong.
I’ve considered all views and canvassed the views of my constituents (clearly there were many different views) but ultimately this is the position I’ve come to. I believe it’s time for a new approach for tackling Covid that shies away from and rules out onerous restrictions. I do not believe that voting through Covid Plan B tomorrow would be the best thing for the country or my constituents. That’s why I’ve taken the difficult decision to vote against the Government tomorrow. Not a decision I take lightly at all.
